“Ancient Armageddon”: How SEO Is Helping Archaeologists Debunk Conspiracy Theories

Posted by

The viewpoints expressed within this story are solely the author’s and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of Online search engine Journal or its affiliates.

You may have found out about “Ancient Armageddon”, a series in which host Graham Hancock proposes controversial theories about the origins of ancient civilizations.

It invested a week trending in the global top 10 on Netflix, accumulating around 24,620,000 watch hours between November 14th and November 20th, 2022.

Netflix provides authority to the program by categorizing it as a “docuseries,” and IMDB classifies it as a “documentary” and “history.”

However online, it’s been shrouded in controversy, and search algorithms may be gratifying good-faith critiques about the program from scientists and teachers– as some working archeologists have considered the show dubious pseudoscience at finest, and dangerous misinformation at worst.

The Society For American Archaeology composed a letter to Netflix asking it to reclassify and contextualize the show, mentioning the host’s “aggressive rhetoric,” the program’s “incorrect claims,” and the associations that the theories presented have with “racist, white supremacist ideologies.”

However this is a story about the function SEO plays in the debate– how researchers and science communicators provide their critiques of the show, and how audiences find them.

Search algorithms get a lot of critiques for how they can be utilized to spread misinformation.

But in this case, I’ve seen support for educators and researchers who have actually dedicated to pressing back on popular pseudoscience.

Creators Rebutting “Ancient Armageddon” Get An Increase From SEO

I first found out of the controversy from Buy YouTube Subscribers creator “History With Kayleigh,” who, while not a scholastic or certified archaeologist, produces educational videos about ancient history and archaeological sites.

She communicated with Tweets from researchers who had actually reacted and “chose to attempt and compose a fair rebuttal to the show,” as she informed me.

Kayleigh’s video about “Ancient Apocalypse” isn’t the best-performing video on her channel. Still, it was definitely performing above the average of her recent releases in a short quantity of time, at 67,000 views on December 1st.

Screenshot from Buy YouTube Subscribers, December

2022 However then, I took another screenshot of the channel after the weekend, on December 5th

. Kayleigh released a 2nd video, and the very first” Ancient Armageddon: Reality Or Fiction?” had actually currently grown to 104,000 views

. Screenshot from Buy YouTube Subscribers, December 2022 Kayleigh wasn’t the only creator to release content about the Netflix series. Dr. Expense Farley, an archaeologist and associate teacher at Southern Connecticut State University who runs a

small Buy YouTube Subscribers channel about archaeology in his free time, made one of the earliest Buy YouTube Subscribers videos critiquing Hancock and the show. And while his reach is much smaller, his videos about”Ancient Armageddon” exploded. Screenshot from Buy YouTube Subscribers, December 2022 Screenshot from Buy YouTube Subscribers, December 2022 Dr. Farley shared screenshots of his Buy YouTube Subscribers analytics, showing that

his very first video about Graham Hancock drew more traffic than normal from Google searches. The below screenshots are from November 22nd, when

the video was still around 5,000 views. For that specific video, the” external”traffic source was around 28 %, compared to his channel average of around 10%. A 3rd of that external traffic was from Google.

Screenshot of internal analytics of the”Archeology Tube” Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022< img src= "https://cdn.searchenginejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/unnamed-639a5869b100b-sej.png"alt=" A screenshot of YouTube channel"Archaeology Tube"internal analytics"/ > Screenshot of internal analytics of the “Archeology Tube” Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022

The following screenshot is the overall channel data for comparison. Screenshot of internal analytics of the “Archeology Tube” Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November

2022 He likewise shared the search terms the video was carrying out best for within Buy YouTube Subscribers search. Screenshot of internal analytics of the “Archeology Tube” Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022 I signed in once again with his channel on December 5th. Screenshot from Buy YouTube Subscribers, December 2022 This first video still acquires most of its

traffic from search terms. External views on it were about 11% lower on December 5th than they were on November 22nd. This makes sense with publications getting the story

and filling up search engine results pages(SERPs ). Screenshot of internal analytics of the”Archeology Tube”Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022 The 2nd video has extremely various data, being pressed primarily by Buy YouTube Subscribers’s browse features like recommended videos. Screenshot of internal analytics of the “Archeology Tube” Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022

This time, Buy YouTube Subscribers appears to have actually acknowledged the interest in a trending topic and pressed the video appropriately. In the first video that he made about”Ancient Archaeology, “Dr. Farley dealt with Hancock straight with a critique focusing on the relationship in between the theories posed in the program, and white supremacy.

In the second video, Dr. Farley concentrated on unmasking the specific fallacies in the show.

He informed me, “There is a MARKED distinction in the responses to the two videos. In video # 1, I discuss white supremacy and the history of Atlantean myths with racism. That video has … hundreds of disparaging remarks [that] are misogynistic, racist, and homophobic.

The 2nd video also has some remarks like this, however many more positive remarks or useful criticisms. This video just spoke straight to a few of the falsehoods in the show however does not directly resolve racism or white supremacy.”

Even with the unfavorable response, the truth stays that people enjoyed and engaged with the video, as this screenshot of the video’s engagement stats reveals.

Screenshot of internal analytics of the”Archeology Tube”Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022 One might argue that this is a fluke– which these apparently successful efficiency metrics are simply about taking advantage of a trending keyword.

But Buy YouTube Subscribers algorithms work in a different way from Google Search.

Buy YouTube Subscribers utilizes metadata about videos to estimate relevance, however it likewise utilizes user engagement signals such as watch time to evaluate the importance of videos to specific questions. Buy YouTube Subscribers’s leading ranking aspect is audience complete satisfaction.

“History with Kayleigh” has a large following already that most likely provided her videos an increase. But Dr. Farley doesn’t have a big following, and the reach of his videos boils down to organic discovery.

People Search For Info About “Ancient Apocalypse” And Discover Critique

Other scientists, with small and big followings, have actually likewise seen uncommonly high traffic about this subject on other platforms.

Dr. Flint Dibble, an archaeologist at Cardiff University, composed a counterclaim for The Discussion and noted the popularity of the piece on Twitter:

Screenshot from Twitter, November 2022

I reached out to Dr. Dibble for his perspective. He specified: “I have actually gotten a large range of responses to my thread. Lots of abuse, and plenty of praise. A number of individuals plainly found it while looking for more information on the show.

Some, especially within the first week of release, mentioned they were browsing Twitter to find responses to it either before watching or mid-watch.

Individuals who pointed out finding the thread through a search were all grateful for rapidly getting a clearer context for the program.”

He shared an example of a Twitter user who went trying to find info about the show while they were seeing it and valued the review he published on the platform:

Screenshot from Twitter, December 2022

Dr. Andre Costopoulos, an archaeologist at the University Of Alberta, wrote about the program on his personal WordPress blog site and shared his blog site analytics with me in late November.

The content he blogged about “Ancient Apocalypse” ended up being the very best carrying out on his site in a matter of days, with Google Search comprising the clear bulk of traffic.

Screenshot of internal analytics from archeothoughts.wordpress.com, November 2022

Overall, this isn’t a substantial amount of traffic. What’s intriguing here is how the material about the show compares to other material by this developer, particularly since the website is relatively small.

Dr. Costopoulos thinks that researchers can reach audiences starving for info if they find out the tools.

“Scientists can use these tools just as well as our pseudo-alters,” he informed me, “and often to much better effect, since we actually have proof to back up our claims.”

How SEO Can Be Used To Spread Out False Information

Browse algorithms are hotbeds of misinformation.

Dissemination of conspiracies and false information has been a hot subject on various platforms, from Buy YouTube Subscribers to Buy Facebook Verification Badge.

Google has been considering false information and how finest to solve it for many years.

Individuals who peddle conspiracy theories and pseudoscience understand this. They’re skilled online marketers and storytellers, and they’re good at SEO.

That can make it far more difficult to interact excellent science than misinformation. Scientists have demanding jobs outside of marketing and publishing, and their conclusions are often challenging to communicate efficiently.

They’re not trained to do it, and academia is slow to adjust to digital patterns.

That leads the way for a conspiracy theory to take off with bit more than an excellent story and good marketing.

Dr. Farley stated: “By and big, I believe academics have no concept how to do SEO (I’m just stumbling around in the dark myself), and false information folks are much, much better at it. Academics, frankly, do not have the time to learn this stuff.

It would be really cool if our universities would assist … however I have actually found the media departments at unis are very old school. If I brought this to them, they ‘d pitch a media statement to the regional newspaper.

Our media department is great and has terrific objectives, however by and big, they’re early in the video game on utilizing social networks as a media tool.”

So we have a problem where researchers, who aren’t necessarily trained in interactions and marketing, take on versus expert marketers of ideas. And they’re doing it with individual enthusiasm tasks on top of their existing tasks.

When it pertains to natural reach, scientists need allies.

Is Review Of “Ancient Apocalypse” Having An Impact?

The results do not seem as encouraging when you zoom out and take a look at the SERPs for “Ancient Armageddon.”

I opened an incognito window in Chrome and ensured my VPN was turned on (United States area), then looked for [ancient apocalypse]

The results here are a bit of a mixed bag. The first outcome is just a link to the program. That’s to be anticipated.

Instantly below are the video results. The second video result appears to support the show. It had around 60,000 views when I took the screenshot. That’s a substantial amount of reach compared to the examples we took a look at above.

The 3rd video outcome has much less views but reviews the show.

We can also see, on the info panel, that the reviews from the clinical neighborhood might not be having a prevalent impact. Audiences evaluate the show well.

Below the video results, we do see reviews from The Guardian and Slate. Let’s turn over to the news outcomes.

These are primarily reviews of the program released on large media platforms. Journalists are helping researchers get their message out.

I checked in once again a few days later on, utilizing an anonymous guest Chrome browser with my VPN switched on (United States place). There was a fascinating modification in the SERP:

It looks like Google picked up on the debate and the newsworthiness of the search. The video outcomes were gone, replaced by a “Leading Stories” search function that appears above the organic results.

So, what’s the takeaway here?

Archaeologists Saw An Increase From SEO With Limited, However Important, Impact

Archaeologists did see an increase from SEO on this subject. But we can see from Google results that the show is popular, and the show’s advocates have a great deal of traction too.

The restricted impact of this cumulative effort shows the difficulties dealing with science communicators. The impact of their review seems to be a drop in the container compared to countless people who enjoyed the show.

But we shouldn’t discount the success of these researchers and teachers, either.

They’re constructing neighborhoods, offering information for individuals who search for it, and altering minds. When you look closely, you can clearly search algorithms rewarding these developers for their efforts.

Interested users do discover legitimate scientific research when they look into the series. The content is reaching people, and it’s motivating them to examine the program critically.

This is encouraging news for the total quality of search.

I think marketers can help here.

SEO specialists have the understanding and resources to help magnify these messages. Possibly we could consider it a little bit of search social work.

More resources:

Featured Image: Elnur/SMM Panel